In a related article about banks and politics before one year i ask the question.Politics or banks will recover first from reputation crisis?Question which remain the same today a year after.Politics in a race to save their reputation and 'assets'.Also banks in the same race to save their reputation and assets.But how they expect to achieve goals which may set?
The problem Problem is the economic disaster which occur the past March in 2013. Political Really what do you feel when you see a politician to share an opinion in the media when is obviously that was responsible for one destructive event? When someone mislead the public?Members of the parliament which every year vote a deficit budget,and now they blame others for their own mistakes? How they expect faith and trust from the public? The syndrome of apathy One government,the central bank,the ministry of economy and after the parliament was responsible for assessment of the risk which before occur in Ireland,the main reason was the property bubble.What they do?Nothing. Banks Banks also remain in the same level.Population,business affected,but who cares.What actions taken to reduce the impact.Government make suggestions,the other parties their owns,banks others,bank stakeholders other suggestions and finally the executive his own.Now the government almost set the country into the markets and the opposition blame the government!What actions they take in the five years of governing? How they communicate?They expect from public to understand? Those actions hit the reputation of politicians and banks also. Lack of well preparation,and non existent communication. Those factors make the public to feel unprotected.When politicians and banks will understand that? Reputation is a factor which you build your future.Feel free to comment on this 'do you believe that politicians and banks is with or without future'? Thank, andreas.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Public
|